Bruce Lehrmann Wikipedia, Wiki, Linkedin, Hillsong, Wife, Report
Bruce Lehrmann Wikipedia, Wiki, Linkedin, Hillsong, Wife, Report -: Former political assistant Bruce Lehrmann has claimed that he did not rape Brittany Higgins and that he has not ruled out suing her.
In his first TV appearance since the allegation broke, Lehrmann provided his version of events to the Seven Network’s Spotlight program, stating the assault “simply didn’t happen.”
Following a night of drinking with colleagues, Higgins alleges that Lehrmann sexually attacked her in Parliament House in February 2019.
He has consistently denied the accusations made against him. After the first trial was abandoned owing to jury misconduct last year, the prosecution dropped the charges against Lehrmann earlier this year out of concern for the potential implications a second trial may have on Higgins’ mental health.
Bruce Lehrmann Bio
| Name | Bruce Lehrmann |
| Nickname | Bruce |
| Age | 28 years old in 2023 |
| Date Of Birth | June 1995 |
| Profession | Political Advisor |
| Religion | Christian |
| Nationality | Australian |
| Birthplace | Australia |
Bruce Lehrmann Wikipedia, Wiki, Linkedin, Hillsong, Wife, Report
Bruce Lehrmann Measurement
| Height | 5 Feet 9 Inch |
| Weight | 69 Kg |
| Eye Colour | Black |
| Hair Colour | Dark Brown |
Bruce Lehrmann Wikipedia, Wiki, Linkedin, Hillsong, Wife, Report
Bruce Lehrmann Educational Qualifications
| School | High schools |
| College or University | Private University |
| Educational Degree | Graduated |
Bruce Lehrmann Wikipedia, Wiki, Linkedin, Hillsong, Wife, Report
Bruce Lehrmann Family
| Father | Not Known |
| Mother | Not Known |
| Brother / Sister | Not Known |
| Children | Not Known |
Bruce Lehrmann Marital Status
| Marital Status | Unmarried |
| Suppose Name | Not Known |
| Affairs | Not Known |
Bruce Lehrmann Wikipedia, Wiki, Linkedin, Hillsong, Wife, Report
Bruce Lehrmann’s Net Worth
| Net Worth in Dollars | $500-700k USD |
| Salary | Not Known |
Bruce Lehrmann Wikipedia, Wiki, Linkedin, Hillsong, Wife, Report
Bruce Lehrmann Social Media Accounts
| Click Here | |
| Click Here | |
| Click Here | |
| Youtube | Click Here |
Bruce Lehrmann News
Trial judge Bruce Lehrmann issues a rare caution that criticism of solicitors has been “oppressive and unfair.”
Chief Justice Lucy McCallum of the ACT Supreme Court made her statement as the government was getting ready to submit its report on Lehrmann’s prosecution.
The trial judge who presided over the case against Bruce Lehrmann has given a rare warning, claiming that the personal cost of criticizing lawyers has turned into something that is “oppressive and unfair”.
The chief judge of the ACT supreme court, Lucy McCallum, wrote to the territory’s solicitors on Monday, welcoming public scrutiny of the legal system but cautioning that it might eventually have an adverse effect on people personally.
Days after its contents were extensively covered by the Australian and the ABC, the statement comes as the ACT government gears up to disclose the final result of the Sofronoff inquiry into the ACT prosecution of Lehrmann.
McCallum did not specifically mention the Lehrmann proceedings or specific solicitors.
The ACT’s judicial system has received unheard-of attention over the past year, according to her. “Public scrutiny is a welcome and necessary aspect of open justice, but there comes a point where it becomes oppressive and unfair to the practitioners involved personally.”
“At this time, I urge all practitioners to treat one another with kindness and respect. I look forward to continuing to work with the local legal community to build on this jurisdiction’s many strengths.”
The Director of Public Prosecutions who oversaw the Lehrmann trial, Shane Drumgold SC, has received a lot of negative press recently.
The Sofronoff inquiry provided embargoed copies of the final report to the Australian and the ABC, but not to any other media outlets, on the condition that they wait to publish until the government had tabled and made public Sofronoff’s final report.
Although the investigation found against the initial complaint of police detectives who thought there wasn’t enough evidence to take the matter to court, it made major findings against Drumgold, including that he unlawfully attempted to hide material from the defense and mislead a judge. This conclusion does not prove Bruce Lehrmann’s guilt or innocence; he has refuted the claim that he sexually assaulted Brittany Higgins.
Lehrmann praised Sofronoff’s final report’s reporting and urged the ACT government to “show leadership and hold the ODPP [the office of the DPP] to account” together with his defense attorney Steven Whybrow SC.
Drumgold is said to have seen specifics of the anticipated negative conclusions that were to be made against him, but the final report was given to two journalists before he did.
Before the chief minister, Andrew Barr, the DPP’s office, the ACT’s police chief, Neil Gaughan, and anybody else in ACT Policing, the two media outlets also obtained copies of the final report.
Geoffrey Watson, a former adviser to the Independent Commission Against Corruption and the director of the Centre for Public Integrity, expressed his disgust at the report’s hasty release earlier in the day.
He pointed out that the ACT Inquiries Act provided explicit guidelines about how those involved in such inquiries should handle confidential information, prohibiting them from disclosing it to outsiders and giving the chief minister the authority to decide whether to disclose the report in full or in part.
He explained: “The reason for that is that they may have concerns about the manner in which a commission was conducted or reported upon, or they may have concerns about whether procedural fairness was provided.” By just sending this information to the media, it appears to me that the chief minister has been denied those really crucial actions.
Drumgold explained his resignation on Sunday by admitting his errors and the untenability of his position. The accusation that he “engaged in deliberate or dishonest conduct in the trial or that I was dishonest” was, however, denied by him. He stated that he had anticipated the investigation would look into how the legal system handles sexual assault charges and complainants.
According to Drumgold, “the handling of the case was reflective of the long-standing issue with how our legal institutions handle allegations of sexual violence in Australia.”
Although he acknowledged that his behavior was “less than perfect,” he said that “all of my decisions were made in good faith, under tremendous, sometimes crippling, pressure.”
Drumgold’s remark, according to Lehrmann, was unacceptable. His statement that Drum Gold’s resignation “shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone”
“The response from the former Director is not acceptable, insufficient, and not worth the paper it is written on,” he declared. “The ACT government must now take the initiative and hold the ODPP accountable. Unless they do, I will.
Whybrow claimed that the statement seemed to suggest that he “saw himself more as a social justice crusader than an independent minister for justice”.
Being a DPP, a position that already holds so much opaque and unreviewable influence over the lives of those who interact with the criminal justice system, he stated, “This apparent ‘end justifies the means’ explanation for his conduct is frankly alarming.”
The Sofronoff report looked into how Higgins handled the rape claims against Lehrmann and the subsequent investigation and prosecution. She said that in 2019, her former coworker Lehrmann sexually assaulted her in Parliament House.
Lehrmann has consistently disputed the charge of rape, and no findings have been made against him. Lehrmann entered a not-guilty plea to one count of engaging in sexual activity without consent. The ACT Supreme Court tried Lehrmann in October, but owing to improper conduct by the jury, a mistrial was declared.
Because they were concerned about the impact a second trial would have on Higgins’ mental state, the prosecution ultimately dismissed the charges against him.
Watson claimed that the investigation had lost the chance to look into how sexual assault accusers were handled by the legal system.
“This was an opportunity to at least examine how this is going wrong in the ACT and it was completely bypassed,” the man claimed. You have to wonder what people’s thoughts are regarding the accomplishments of this commission.
Also Read :