Rolling Stone Sound of Freedom Review

Rolling Stone Sound of Freedom Review

Rolling Stone Sound of Freedom Review -: The intro of Sound of Freedom is a stomach-turning sequence that shows how two siblings are drawn into the nefarious clutches of child traffickers. A glamorous woman posing as a modeling scout rounds up the most apple-cheeked prospects and separates them from their parents. The scene is clinically shot, with no attempt to sugarcoat the reality of child trafficking.

Rolling Stone Sound of Freedom Review
Rolling Stone Sound of Freedom Review

The intro is followed by a montage of news footage about child trafficking, which drives home the point that this is a real problem that is happening every day. The film then introduces the main character, John Harrison (Jim Caviezel), a federal agent who is determined to rescue the missing sister of a boy he saved from sex slavery.

The intro of Sound of Freedom is an effective way to introduce the film’s themes and set the tone for the rest of the story. It is a powerful and disturbing scene that will stay with viewers long after they have seen the film.

Here are some additional details about the intro of Sound of Freedom:

  • The scene takes place in Colombia.
  • The woman posing as a modeling scout is named Carla.
  • The siblings are named Miguel and Ana.
  • The scene is shot in a matter-of-fact way, with no attempt to sensationalize the events.
  • The scene is followed by a montage of news footage about child trafficking.
  • The film then introduces John Harrison.

Rolling Stone Sound of Freedom

Here are some additional details about the film Sound of Freedom from Rolling Stone:

  • The film was directed by Sean McNamara and stars Jim Caviezel as John Ballard, a former Navy SEAL who now works as a private investigator.
  • The film is based on the real-life experiences of Tim Ballard, the founder of the anti-trafficking organization Operation Underground Railroad.
  • The film has been criticized for its white savior narrative, its sensationalized depiction of child trafficking, and its lack of focus on the victims of trafficking.
  • The film has also been accused of promoting conspiracy theories, as Caviezel is a vocal supporter of QAnon.

In their review, Rolling Stone called Sound of Freedom a “superhero movie for dads with brain worms.” The reviewer argued that the film is exploitative and does not provide an accurate depiction of child trafficking. The reviewer also criticized the film’s lack of focus on the victims of trafficking.

Here are some specific criticisms that were raised in the review:

  • The film’s depiction of child trafficking is “stomach-turning” and “uncomfortable” to watch.
  • The film’s portrayal of the rescue process is unrealistic and does not reflect the extensive support that victims of trafficking need.
  • The film enforces stereotypes about trafficking that Angel Studios itself says are less than accurate.
  • The film’s intended viewers are those who are already convinced that child trafficking is a major problem, and the film does little to inform or educate them.

Overall, Rolling Stone gave Sound of Freedom a negative review, calling it “not worth your time or money.” The reviewer concluded that the film is “a harmful and exploitative film that does nothing to help the fight against child trafficking.”

Rolling Stone Sound of Freedom Review

here is a summary of Rolling Stone’s review of Sound of Freedom:

  • The film is a white savior narrative that fetishizes the torture of child victims and lingers over lush preludes to their sexual abuse.
  • The film enforces stereotypes about trafficking that Angel Studios itself says are less than accurate.
  • The film is hobbled by a near-total absence of procedural logic.
  • The film’s intended viewers are those who are already convinced that child trafficking is a major problem, and the film does little to inform or educate them.

In addition to these criticisms, Rolling Stone also noted that the film’s depiction of child trafficking is “stomach-turning” and “uncomfortable” to watch. The reviewer also took issue with the film’s portrayal of the rescue process, which is unrealistic and does not reflect the extensive support that victims of trafficking need.

Overall, Rolling Stone gave Sound of Freedom a negative review, calling it “a superhero movie for dads with brain worms.” The reviewer concluded that the film is “not worth your time or money.”

Here are some additional details from the review:

  • The film’s protagonist, John Ballard, is a former Navy SEAL who now works as a private investigator. He is tasked with rescuing a young girl named Hannah who has been kidnapped and forced into prostitution.
  • Ballard’s investigation leads him to a group of traffickers who are operating a child sex ring. He eventually manages to rescue Hannah, but not before she is subjected to horrific abuse.
  • The film’s depiction of child trafficking is based on the real-life experiences of anti-trafficking activists. However, the reviewer argued that the film’s portrayal of the issue is “sensationalized” and “exploitative.”
  • The reviewer also criticized the film’s lack of focus on the victims of trafficking. The film does not show how Hannah is coping with her trauma, and it does not provide any information about the resources that are available to help victims of trafficking.

Overall, Rolling Stone’s review of Sound of Freedom is a scathing one. The reviewer argues that the film is exploitative and does not provide an accurate depiction of child trafficking. The reviewer also criticizes the film’s lack of focus on the victims of trafficking.

Sound of Freedom Promo

Also Read :

Leave a Comment